Stephen Hopkins: Before The Mayflower
Was England Glad To Be Rid Of Him?
Submitted by: Harold C. Hopkins, Fowarded by Adrian Hopkins
It appears that Stephen Hopkins (1583-1644), the Mayflower
nonconformist, first came to America in 1609. The Seaventure, on which he was a passenger
from England, was wrecked and he was among the 150 persons cast ashore on Bermuda and
marooned nine months. It didn't take Stephen long to get attention by attempting to
persuade others to disobey the governor on grounds the latter's "authority ceased
when the wracke was committed."
The account is found in a short chapter (pp 374-75) of the comprehensive book on early
Virginia, "Adventurers of Purse and Person, Virginia 1607-1624/5," revised and
edited by Virginia M. Meyer (1974-1981) and John Frederick Dorman (1981-1987) and
published by order of First Families of Virgina 1607-1624/5, third ed., 1987.
Based on "A True Reportory of the Wracke and Redemption of Sir Thomas Gates, Knight:
Upon and from the Islands of the Bermuda, his Coming to Virginia and the Estate of the
colony Then and After under the Government of the Lord de la Warr," the
"Adventurers" account notes that Stephen was manacled and court martialed for
mutiny and rebellion but "so penitent was he and made so much moane...that the whole
company besought the Governor and never left him until we had got his pardon."
This account is given in William Strachey's record of the voyage and the wreck of the
Seaventure, "which also noted that while Hopkins was very religious, he was
contentious and defiant of authority and had enough learning to undertake to wrest
leadership from others."
Two pinnaces, the Patience and Deliverance, were constructed on the Somers Islands
(Bermuda) and it's presumed that the stiff-necked Stephen Hopkins was a passenger when
these small sailing boats set out for Jamestown. Apparently, the Jamestown authorities had
no warm welcome for him there. "Adventurers" concludes:
"In view of his [Hopkins's] past disturbances the [Jamestown] authorities could not
have been loth to part with him and 'it is reasonable to suppose that he was allowed to
return to England on one of the first ships,'" quoting from the New England
Historical and Genealogical Register (Boston 1847-).